@article{2019,title={MYTHOLOGICAL DIFFERENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF VISUAL PLASTICS FROM THE SUBJECT TO THE OBJECT},abstractNode={In the production of art, human being tried to base the world on the basis of comparing or reflecting the world with its similarities or contradictions, whether modern or primitive. The ability to organize myths through oppositions is not only about the existence of a visual object in all of the cultural events and the imagination of its creator, but it is also seen as an attempt to create a model between nature and culture. The situation in action and production characterizes the products of the subject who establishes identity with nature. The constituent subject follows the transition from the realm of consciousness to the state of consciousness through the relationship of the form with its existence. Identifying oneself with animals is a result of being a part of nature and hence being an element of society freeing the object from its relativity. The dialectical thought structure may show similarities in the transmission of the message. Meaning is not a sequence of time and events, but a kind of transformation in its combination with other myths. The realm perceived by mythological consciousness indicates that the ideal with the real, the object and the subject, no difference between the big and the small or the whole and the part. The connection between man and nature is almost a living, living organism. The relationship between living beings and objective beings with various similarities, the emergence of cosmic elements in cosmogonic actions are the actions carried out in the religious and mythological thoughts of cultures. Ethnographic material is explained by systematic transfers of cultural motifs and codes in the transmission of visual plastic style and structure. The fact that the cultural level of societies is being constructed with the system of mythological representations is nothing other than the configurations of the pattern of beliefs and images that are shaped by a visual mechanism.},author={Gülten GÜLTEPE},year={2019},journal={Turkish Studies-Social Sciences}}